Understanding Your Feedback

Table of contents


Overview

This guide helps you understand, interpret, and effectively use the AI-generated feedback you receive on your assignments. Learn how to navigate feedback reports, understand scoring, identify key improvements, and plan your revisions.

Accessing Your Feedback

Notification of Feedback

You'll know feedback is ready through:

  1. Email Notification
Subject: Feedback Available - Essay 1 Draft 2

Hi Sarah,

Your feedback for Essay 1: Personal Narrative (Draft 2) 
is now available in FeedForward.

Course: ENGL101 - Introduction to Academic Writing
Instructor: Dr. Jane Smith
Submitted: October 10, 2024
Feedback Ready: October 11, 2024

View Your Feedback: [Click Here]

Best regards,
The FeedForward Team
  1. Dashboard Alert
πŸ”” New Notification
Feedback ready for Essay 1 Draft 2
  1. Course Page Indicator
Essay 1: Personal Narrative
Status: βœ… Feedback Available
[View Feedback]

Opening Your Feedback

Navigate to feedback:

  1. From Email: Click direct link
  2. From Dashboard: Click notification
  3. From Course: - Go to assignment - Click "View Feedback" - Select draft version

Feedback Report Structure

Overview Section

The top of your feedback shows:

Feedback Report
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

Assignment: Essay 1: Personal Narrative
Draft: 2 of 3
Submitted: October 10, 2024, 2:47 PM
Reviewed: October 11, 2024, 10:15 AM

Overall Score: 82% (B)
Improvement: +7% from Draft 1

πŸ“Š Quick Summary:
Your personal narrative shows significant improvement 
in organization and evidence use. The thesis is now 
clearer, and your examples effectively support your 
main points. Focus on strengthening your conclusion 
and addressing minor grammatical issues for your 
final draft.

Instructor Note:
"Great progress, Sarah! Your revisions really 
strengthened the essay's impact. Let's discuss 
your conclusion strategy during office hours."

Rubric Breakdown

Detailed scoring by category:

Rubric Evaluation
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

πŸ“ Thesis Statement (20% of grade)
Score: 17/20 (85%) ↑ +3 from Draft 1
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Your thesis "Social media has fundamentally altered 
how my generation forms and maintains friendships" 
is clear and arguable. It effectively previews your 
main points about online vs. offline relationships.

Strengths:
βœ“ Clear, specific claim
βœ“ Arguable position
βœ“ Sets up essay structure

Area for Improvement:
β€’ Consider adding why this matters to make the 
  thesis more compelling

πŸ’‘ Suggestion:
Add a "so what" element: "...friendships, creating 
both new opportunities for connection and unexpected 
challenges for authentic relationships."

Category-by-Category Analysis

Each rubric category includes:

  1. Score and Percentage - Points earned/possible - Letter grade equivalent - Change from previous draft

  2. Specific Feedback - What you did well - What needs work - Concrete examples from your text

  3. Improvement Suggestions - Actionable next steps - Examples of fixes - Resources to consult

Example continued:

πŸ“š Evidence & Support (25% of grade)
Score: 21/25 (84%) ↑ +4 from Draft 1
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Your use of personal anecdotes and research has 
improved significantly. The example about your 
online gaming friendship (paragraph 3) effectively 
illustrates your point about digital connections.

Strengths:
βœ“ Mix of personal and researched evidence
βœ“ Specific, detailed examples
βœ“ Evidence clearly supports claims

Areas for Improvement:
β€’ Second body paragraph needs stronger example
β€’ One source needs proper citation

πŸ’‘ Suggestions:
1. Add specific dialogue or scene to paragraph 2
2. Fix citation for Smith (2023) - missing page number
3. Consider adding one more scholarly source

Understanding Scores

Score Interpretation

What your scores mean:

Grade Scale:
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

A  (93-100%): Exceptional work
A- (90-92%):  Excellent work
B+ (87-89%):  Very good work
B  (83-86%):  Good work
B- (80-82%):  Above average work
C+ (77-79%):  Slightly above average
C  (73-76%):  Average work
C- (70-72%):  Below average
D  (60-69%):  Poor work
F  (0-59%):   Failing work

Score Components

Understanding the breakdown:

Your Score Calculation:
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

Thesis (20%):      17/20 Γ— 0.20 = 3.4
Evidence (25%):    21/25 Γ— 0.25 = 5.25
Organization (20%): 18/20 Γ— 0.20 = 3.6
Style (20%):       16/20 Γ— 0.20 = 3.2
Grammar (15%):     13/15 Γ— 0.15 = 1.95
                   ________________
Total:             82/100 = 82% (B)

Progress Indicators

Track your improvement:

Draft Comparison:
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

         Draft 1  Draft 2  Change
Overall:   75%     82%     +7% ↑
Thesis:    14      17      +3 ↑
Evidence:  17      21      +4 ↑
Org:       15      18      +3 ↑
Style:     15      16      +1 ↑
Grammar:   12      13      +1 ↑

🎯 Most Improved: Evidence (+4)
⚠️ Focus Next: Style & Grammar

Types of Feedback

Strengths Recognition

Feedback highlights what you're doing well:

🌟 Key Strengths Identified:

1. Organization
   "Your essay follows a clear chronological structure 
   that effectively guides readers through your 
   experience with online friendships."

2. Voice and Style
   "Your personal voice comes through authentically, 
   making the narrative engaging and relatable."

3. Introduction
   "The opening anecdote immediately draws readers 
   in and sets up your thesis naturally."

Constructive Criticism

Areas for improvement with specific guidance:

πŸ”§ Areas for Improvement:

1. Conclusion (Moderate Priority)
   Current: "Your conclusion restates the thesis but 
   doesn't synthesize your insights or look forward."

   Suggestion: "Try ending with reflection on how 
   understanding these changes helps you navigate 
   both online and offline relationships. What have 
   you learned? How will you apply it?"

   Example: "Understanding how social media has 
   changed friendship hasn't made me delete my 
   accountsβ€”it's helped me use them more intentionally, 
   balancing digital connection with face-to-face 
   moments that technology can't replace."

Specific Examples

Feedback references your actual text:

πŸ“ Specific Text References:

Paragraph 3, Lines 4-6:
Your text: "Me and my friend Jake met in a game 
and we talk every day even though we never met 
in real life."

Feedback: "This example effectively illustrates 
your point about online friendships. Consider 
revising for grammar: 'Jake and I met in a game. 
We talk every day, even though we've never met 
in person.'"

Why this change?
- Correct pronoun case (Jake and I)
- Fix run-on sentence
- More formal tone ('in person' vs 'in real life')

Feedback Categories

Content Feedback

Addresses your ideas and arguments:

  • Thesis Development
  • Clarity of main argument
  • Specificity of claims
  • Arguability and significance

  • Evidence Quality

  • Relevance to thesis
  • Credibility of sources
  • Integration effectiveness

  • Analysis Depth

  • Critical thinking shown
  • Connections made
  • Insights developed

Structure Feedback

Focuses on organization:

  • Overall Structure
  • Logical flow
  • Paragraph organization
  • Transitions between ideas

  • Paragraph Development

  • Topic sentences
  • Supporting details
  • Concluding sentences

  • Introduction/Conclusion

  • Hook effectiveness
  • Thesis placement
  • Closure achievement

Style Feedback

Addresses writing style:

  • Voice and Tone
  • Appropriate for audience
  • Consistent throughout
  • Engaging for readers

  • Sentence Variety

  • Mix of lengths
  • Different structures
  • Rhythm and flow

  • Word Choice

  • Precision
  • Academic vocabulary
  • Avoiding repetition

Mechanics Feedback

Technical writing issues:

  • Grammar
  • Sentence structure
  • Verb tenses
  • Agreement issues

  • Punctuation

  • Comma usage
  • Quotation marks
  • Other punctuation

  • Citations

  • Format accuracy
  • In-text citations
  • Works cited/bibliography

Using Feedback Effectively

Creating an Action Plan

Turn feedback into concrete steps:

Revision Action Plan
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

Priority 1: High-Impact Changes (Do First)
β–‘ Rewrite conclusion with synthesis
β–‘ Add page number to Smith citation
β–‘ Fix comma splices in paragraphs 3 & 5

Priority 2: Medium-Impact Changes
β–‘ Strengthen example in paragraph 2
β–‘ Add transition before paragraph 4
β–‘ Vary sentence beginnings

Priority 3: Polish (If Time)
β–‘ Replace repeated words
β–‘ Check all punctuation
β–‘ Read aloud for flow

Time Estimate: 3-4 hours total

Revision Strategies

Systematic approach to revision:

  1. Global Revisions First - Structure changes - Argument strengthening - Evidence additions

  2. Paragraph-Level Next - Topic sentences - Transitions - Support details

  3. Sentence-Level Last - Grammar fixes - Word choice - Punctuation

Tracking Changes

Document your revisions:

Revision Log
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

βœ“ Conclusion rewritten - added synthesis
βœ“ Smith citation - added page 45
βœ“ Paragraph 3 comma splice - fixed
βœ“ Paragraph 5 comma splice - fixed
βœ“ New example in paragraph 2 - personal story
⚑ Transition added before paragraph 4
⚑ Working on sentence variety
β—‹ Final proofreading pending

Understanding AI Feedback

Multiple AI Perspectives

Your feedback may come from multiple AI models:

AI Analysis Sources:
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

This feedback synthesizes insights from:
β€’ GPT-4 (3 evaluations)
β€’ Claude-3 (3 evaluations)
β€’ Aggregate score: Weighted average

Why multiple models?
- Diverse perspectives
- Increased accuracy
- Balanced evaluation
- Reduced bias

AI Limitations

Remember that AI feedback:

  • Supplements instructor expertise
  • May miss creative choices
  • Focuses on patterns and conventions
  • Cannot judge personal significance
  • Benefits from human review
Your instructor reviews all AI feedback before release, adding personal insights and ensuring appropriateness.

Special Feedback Elements

Comparative Analysis

See how you stack up:

Comparative Performance (Anonymous):
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

Your Score: 82%
Class Metrics:
- Average: 78%
- Median: 79%
- Your Rank: Above Average

Rubric Category Comparison:
           You  Class Avg
Thesis:    85%    80%    ↑
Evidence:  84%    75%    ↑
Org:       90%    82%    ↑
Style:     80%    78%    ↑
Grammar:   87%    85%    ↑

Helpful materials provided:

πŸ“š Recommended Resources:

For Conclusion Writing:
- [Writing Center: Effective Conclusions]
- [Video: Synthesis Strategies]
- Sample conclusions handout

For Grammar:
- [Comma Splice Exercise]
- [Grammar checking tool]
- Office hours Tuesday 2-4 PM

For Citations:
- [MLA Citation Guide]
- [Citation generator]
- Library research help

Progress Visualization

Visual improvement tracking:

Your Progress Graph:
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

Score
100% ─
 90% ─                    β—‹ (projected)
 80% ─           ●───────/
 70% ─    ●─────/  82%
 60% ─ 75%
 50% ─
     └─────┬─────┬─────┬─────
        Draft 1  Draft 2  Draft 3

Common Feedback Patterns

Typical First Draft Issues

Common feedback on initial submissions:

  1. Thesis Too Broad - "Narrow your focus" - "Be more specific" - "Make it arguable"

  2. Insufficient Evidence - "Add more examples" - "Include research" - "Develop details"

  3. Organizational Issues - "Clarify structure" - "Add transitions" - "Reorder paragraphs"

Improvement Trajectories

Typical score progressions:

Common Patterns:
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

Big Jump (65% β†’ 80% β†’ 85%):
- Major structural changes
- Significant new content
- Addressed core issues

Steady Climb (72% β†’ 79% β†’ 85%):
- Consistent improvements
- Building on strengths
- Incremental refinement

Plateau Pattern (75% β†’ 78% β†’ 79%):
- Minor changes only
- Missing key feedback
- Need bigger revisions

Next Steps After Feedback

Immediate Actions

Right after reading feedback:

  1. Process Emotionally - Take a breath - Focus on growth - Remember it's about improvement

  2. Read Thoroughly - Don't skim - Note patterns - Identify priorities

  3. Ask Questions - Unclear feedback? - Need clarification? - Want strategies?

Planning Your Next Draft

Strategic revision planning:

Next Draft Checklist:
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

β–‘ Schedule revision time (3-4 hours)
β–‘ Gather resources mentioned
β–‘ List specific changes to make
β–‘ Set milestone checkpoints
β–‘ Plan to submit 24+ hours early
β–‘ Book writing center appointment
β–‘ Prepare questions for instructor

Getting Additional Help

When you need support:

  1. Instructor Office Hours - Bring specific questions - Show your action plan - Discuss strategies

  2. Writing Center - Work through revisions - Practice skills - Get second opinion

  3. Peer Review - Exchange with classmates - Fresh perspectives - Practice giving feedback

Feedback FAQs

Q: Why did my score go down from Draft 1? A: Sometimes addressing major issues reveals smaller problems. This is normal and shows deeper engagement.

Q: Can I discuss feedback with my instructor? A: Absolutely! Instructors encourage questions about feedback during office hours.

Q: What if I disagree with the feedback? A: Discuss with your instructor. AI isn't perfect, and your creative choices matter.

Q: Should I address every single comment? A: Focus on high-impact changes first. Perfect isn't the goalβ€”improvement is.

Tips for Success

Do's

βœ… Read all feedback before starting revision βœ… Prioritize high-impact changes βœ… Use provided resources βœ… Track what you change βœ… Submit next draft promptly βœ… Ask for clarification if needed

Don'ts

❌ Take feedback personally ❌ Make only surface changes ❌ Ignore positive comments ❌ Rush through revisions ❌ Skip instructor notes ❌ Give up after low scores

Next Steps

  1. Create your action plan
  2. Schedule revision time
  3. Begin with highest priorities
  4. Track your progress using the Progress Guide

Print your feedback report and annotate it with your revision plans. This helps you stay organized and track completion.
Remember: Feedback is meant to help you grow as a writer. Every professional writer receives and uses feedbackβ€”it's a normal part of the writing process!